Case Briefing Bus Law

Lucy v . ZehmerSupreme Court of Appeals of Virginia84 S .E .2d 516 (Va . 1954IssueWhether or not the achievement of a contract of sale apprize be ground on a person s mental as manifested by their outward actions or deedsRulingAnalyzing the actions of the parties before and after the alleged writ of execution of the contract of sale , it was rule by the court that if a person s outward manifestations when interpreted by other people by reasonable standards conveys a certain intent it can be judged as the real yet unexpressed subject of that person s mindAnalysisThe facts of the case show that the agreement was made on around the time that Lucy and Zehmer were drinking . Although the witnesses claim that they had a hardly a(prenominal) drinks , at that place are certain pieces of evidence that show that the transaction that transpired was in the nature of a serious business recognize .

The fact that almost 30 to 40 minutes was spend discussing the details of the transaction and that there was no clear test copy of intoxication led the court to rule that there was no fraud or misrepresentation that would lead to inequitable transactionsConclusionIn vox populi in favor of Lucy , the court pointed out that the evidence shows that there was a clear outward manifestation of intent to accomplished the contract of sale . Even assuming that there was a certain level of intoxication shown by the parties such was not enough to cloud the judgment...If you want to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .