History of the Peloponnesian War- "Sparta & Athens"

Not doing so would be abdication of responsibility. A similar line of argument was do to the West when Afri preempts were committing genocide against each early(a) during the 1990s. By and bulky the West did not respond. It did respond to similar calls for aid in Kosovo in the Balkans, though some would say belatedly.

Walzer's account of a just state of war includes a six-part theory of aggression (Walzer 61-2): 1. on that point exists an international "society" of independent states. 2. That society respects the territorial reserve integrity and political sovereignty of all fractions. 3. Use of hurl against such integrity and sovereignty is a crime. 4. Aggression whitethorn justly be opposed by a member state that is defending its sovereignty, or by a calculus of members against the aggressor state. 5. Only aggression justifies war. 6. Aggressors can be twain repulsed and punished. In particular, if if states claim entitlements wrongly, "they must a deal be (someways) the objects of penalisation" (Walzer 63).

While it cannot be said that Corinth was an independent state vis-?-vis Sparta, it can be said that capital of Greece was not respecting its territorial integrity. notwithstanding because Corinth was already subject to Sparta did not prove that Athens could somehow justify its aggression in the region. As it turned out, Sparta in any case went to war and eventually won, but at great cost.

A war is just, in Walzer's view, when it help

---. "The natural law of Peoples." Collected Papers. Ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999. 529-564.

"As Bush and Blair Speak, They Find Many ways to Say, 'We Must Fight Terror.'" New York Times 21 November 2003. .

Kant, Immanuel. sodding(a) Peace and Other Essays. Trans. Ted Humphrey. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1983.

Pericles makes much of Athenian republic vis-?-vis the undemocratic and barbarian nature of Athens' enemies, the Spartans and their allies, though its behavior travel in the face of the obligations that democratic societies incur when war is at issue: "War [aggression] is no longer an admissible means of state policy" (554).

However, in the modern period, war as policy is rationalized because democracy is a superior form of government and expression of civilization. Huntington's idea that Western and Muslim or other Asian civilizations are in danger of going to war over which civilization is better provides theoretical explanation of how that systematization could arise: "A West at the peak of its great power confronts non-Wests that increasingly have the desire, the provide and the resources to shape the world in non-Western ways" (Huntington 25). The hostility of fanatical Islamism toward the West tends to support this, as do Western characterizations of some Islamist states as barbaric ("As Bush").

[I]f I have dwelt at some duration upon the character of our country, it has been to show that our stake in the struggle is not the same as theirs who have no such blessings to lose, and also that the panegyric of the men over whom I am immediately speaking might be by definite proofs established. . . . [T]he Athens that I have celebrated is only what the heroism of these and their like have made her, men whose fame, unlike that of most Hellenes, will be found to be only commensurate with their desolate (Thucydides).

Walzer describes the moral weight that is often assigned to the pros
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.